You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: The Sustainability of Steem - Is Freemium Broken?

in #steem6 years ago

Leaving the air aside, these things are not free as in that they don't cost anybody anything, right? If you are an open source developer, you just make OSS because you enjoy making it, or someone is paying you to make it. Others are then free to use it, yes, but the added value does not come out of thin air.

Anyway, it is all said in the article...

Posted using Steeve

Sort:  

No, they are free as in they don't cost anything, like air, to have and utilize. If you want to argue that those things cost someone else time and energy that doesn't make those products or things not free. Also if you consider that ideas and eurekas generally come directly out of thin air, the added value of those ideas and eurekas does come directly out of thin air.

Posted using Partiko Android

You could say nothing is free and there's something in it for the creators. In the case of something like @dtube they take rewards, in the case of something like Steepshot or other addons to this platform whilethey may not directly charge, the attention and notoriety and power they get helps buildtheir accounts andthey can sell that steem. nobody does something for nothing

You could but then what would freeware and things such as partiko which DON'T take a cut or cost anything be? Clearly there are PLENTY of people who offer things for free, which makes the thing free, even if the ones making such offers are getting something like joy or happiness from it.

Posted using Partiko Android

I guess my point is there's almost always a motive or reason for doing something.Not saying that's a bad thing its just human nature.

My point is that regardless of the motivation or the costs of bringing something to market, if the thing is priced as one cent then it costs one cent, and if it's offered for free, then it's free and arguing that "it costs someone time and energy" or "they're doing it because they get something out of it" only speaks of what it costs to produce or what the motivation to bring it to market is, but it says absolutely nothing about what it costs the consumer, which is expressed quite simply by what it costs a consumer to purchase it, or how much it is offered to them for.

Posted using Partiko Android

So you downvote people who try to have a discussion with you? Cool bro I'll be sure not to engage with you onthis platform anymore.

I didn't downvote you, I upvoted your comment.