You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Steem statistics for 6 years

in #steem21 days ago

I've added an update at the end of the post where, based on your data, I've tried to show the relationship between the number of comments and active authors, and the number of comments and the number of posts.

It seems that the price of STEEM affects the activity of authors, but it is not the only factor. At least now I don't see as direct a dependency as I thought at first. Perhaps a more in-depth analysis is needed, indicating when SBDs were printed, when they were not, and when SBDs were printed simultaneously with STEEM.

What surprised me the most is that Steemit has about the same number of active authors as Hive. Hive knows how to promote itself better and it seemed to me that there is more activity there. The only difference is the geography of the authors.

Sort:  

Thank you for the update. My diagrams really don't look like much :-)

Hive knows how to promote itself better and it seemed to me that there is more activity there.

Yes, Hive can also present more development activities. The hard forks alone that have taken place so far. It doesn't all have to be good, but it gives them attention.
I think it's good that more proposals are being approved. But it seems to me that the supposed centralization at Steem is now taking place at Hive. Even if this is not openly stated there, and probably denied.

The only difference is the geography of the authors.

Where is the comparison from? Is there a source for this?

Where is the comparison from? Is there a source for this?

I've been looking into this a bit: https://hive.blog/created/hive-133987

This is my subjective impression due to the presence of such posts:

The hard forks alone

I remember you repeatedly said that you are ready to work on a hard fork. How are things in this direction? I think you did not manage to find like-minded people?