Sort:  

Lyin' Ver keeps company that fits his ex-con mentality.

Jihan Wu's complicity at attempting to stop Segwit (It would prevent him from using covert Asicboost, a method he used to produce ill-gotten profits at the expense of the network.) is a good example of the company Lyin' Ver keeps.

Link - https://medium.com/bitcoinfoundation/verified-chatlogs-why-jihan-and-jiang-want-to-block-segwit-at-all-cost-bbf068c5ce0f

Complete with chatlogs detailing how Lyin' Ver's buddy wanted to pull a fast one over the network.

Lets not forget Craig Wright - better known as "Faketoshi", who is widely reviled by many thought leaders in the crypto space, even Vitalik Buterin, the creator of Ethereum can't stand this guy.

To wrap it all up with a bow, here's the "Greatest Hits" that Lyin' Ver keeps trying to deflect with his mile-a-minute-talking points -- https://archive.fo/XfYDP

Erik Voorhees, a prominent cryptocurrency millionaire and entrepreneur - has called Roger out for his continuous duplicity and underhanded tactics.

If you support this project, you're just allowing his lies to continue, at your expense.

I'm also consistently right on complex technical/financial subjects, including this one.

If I can help one confused newbie make the right choice, that's all that matters. If some devoted BCH'ers lose money in the process, I'm willing to accept it.

I can point the way through the door of good decisions, but they have to step through themselves. When BCH implodes due to systemic flaws, it will serve as a warning to others.

Nothing is more persuasive than tales of financial woe.

Well your canned (cut & pasted) post seemed to accuse Roger by association rather than anything he personally had done. The bizarre thing is that there are vehement supporters in the Bitcoin Cash camp who sound much like you, using venom and mud slinging to make their case.

There was a strange coincidence, that right after our last exchange that you started following me and then immedoately 100, what looked like, spam accounts started following. All were following and being followrd by approximately the same amount of followers as the following account (whose profile pic was used on a number of said accounts):

https://busy.org/@sezenke

Now if one bought into guilt by association one may think that some black hat ops which you may have had in mind about me went south and its back to the lab to debug the bot. That's why guilt by association does not stand up in court but only paranoid minds. 😎

Let me emphasise that my holdings are of equal amounts in both BTC and BCH. As a holder of both coins you might say my position is on the fence.

If, as a programmer, Bitcoin Cash serms more functional as a currency at the moment and more in line with the original Bitcoin White Paper; then that is what is known as an opinion. To hold anything other than an opinion, in the crypto markets, is delusion in my opinion .

My first programming was done on a mainframe in Fortran on punch cards. My opinions on programming may not always pick the right horse (thought ANSI C would be the Computer Gateway Intetface language of choice because of its cross platform compilability in the early days of the World Wide Web).

It may be good advice to tell crypto noobs to stay out of the volitile matket at this point, especally the Bitcoins end of the pool; but to claim anyone can know difinitively what the market is going to do is.... well frankly BS in my opinion.

You're mental - I'm not following you, and blaming me for "spambots" is absurd.

I don't care if you sat down with Larry Wall and created Perl, it doesn't mean that you can discern the long-term dynamics at play.

But it won't matter - I don't have to do anything, as the systemic flaws that are inherent to BCH will destroy it from within.

The best arbiter is reality, and your altfork is going to get a nice big dose of it.